When your north star business metric — whether it’s conversions, engagement, bookings, or another KPI — declines, do you immediately know why? How long does it take to get answers? How many people need to be involved? And how often do you never actually pinpoint the cause? On the flip side, you want to increase conversions. Do you know what levers to pull or are you always guessing?
Despite the abundance of product analytics, observability, and data warehouse tools, most companies are still left guessing. They struggle to answer fundamental questions like: Is the drop affecting a specific group of users? Is it caused by a technical performance issue, UX friction, or problems with pricing, a marketing campaign or product availability?
We have been asked by multiple retailers and travel & hospitality companies if there is a way to know immediately whether a drop in conversion is because of a technical issue, pricing, or something else like the weather or some other external factor. This is precisely where the union of product analytics, observability and data warehouse tools falls down.
Here is what a typical use of these tools looks like. Product and marketing analytics tools like Adobe and Google Analytics show what users are doing but fail to explain why they are doing it—or why they aren’t doing what you expect. You might notice a shrinking conversion funnel, but without deeper insights, you can’t determine whether:
Without clear direction, the next step is typically checking an observability tool like DataDog, Dynatrace, or NewRelic to assess system performance. However, these tools lack user and business context, forcing teams into a “needle in a haystack” search where they attempt to fix everything just in case or spend hours and days trying to make a connection between the business KPI and system errors. This approach is costly, inefficient, and often fails to uncover the real issue.
As a last resort, companies turn to data science teams. This requires paying to move data into a data warehouse like Snowflake, Databricks or BigQuery, paying again to query it, and diverting data science resources from high-value projects. Even if actionable insights emerge, the process takes days or weeks—by which time the damage is already done, leading to poor customer experiences, lost revenue, and wasted resources.
Meanwhile, there is no time to focus on the real goal: improving your north star business metric.
To understand why product analytics, observability, and data warehouses fail to solve this challenge, we need to first define the critical requirements of an ideal solution:
Continuously compute and connect business, product, and technical performance KPIs in real time.
Analyze fine-grained customer cohorts.
Automate insight generation in real-time for speed and efficiency.
Even when used together, product analytics, observability, and data warehouses fail to meet these critical requirements.
The reason? These platforms lack the core technical capabilities—flexibility, high efficiency, and low latency. The figure below illustrates how the critical requirements map to core technical capabilities.
Product analytics, observability, and data warehouses each make different trade-offs among these, but none successfully meet all three together.

At Conviva, we believe that a new solution—with a new paradigm—is needed to solve this problem. We need a solution that connects the dots automatically, eliminates guesswork, and empowers teams to act in real time—enabling a new way to analyze, diagnose, and improve digital business performance. We gave this new paradigm a name — Real-Time Performance Analytics — and we will describe it in more detail in the next post.